Science Memes

10923 readers

2254 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

856

Zero to hero (mander.xyz)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

134 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That might be integers, but I have no idea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Integer == whole

https://www.etymonline.com/word/integer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

An English dictionary is not really going to tell you what mathematicians are doing. Like, its goal is to describe what the word "integer" means (in various contexts), it won't tell you what the "integer series" is.

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/138633/what-are-the-whole-numbers

The gist I see is that it's kind of ambiguous whether the whole number series includes negatives or not, and in higher math you won't see the term without a strict definition. It's much more likely you'd see "non-negative integers" or the like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

wdym, you know what integers are called in latin languages? "inteiros" (pt), literally "whole". everyone that does higher math (me included) uses it and understands it for what it is: numbers that are not fractions/irationals.

Just cause there exists an English hegemony and your language is ill defined and confused with your multiple words for a single concept, that doesn't mean you get to muddy the waters, rename something in maths, and make a mountain out of a mole hill. Integers include negatives and zero, saying whole numbers and integers is the same, no room for debate

now excuse me while i go touch some grass

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Whoa, whoa, I'm not making this out to be like an imperialism thing. I'm not interested in what people ought to do.

The link I gave, a comment in there gives examples of papers where the term is being used to mean different things. So, this ambiguity is either something you just have to contend with (people using the term wrong), or you just don't read from those people. It's fine. Nobody is coming for you, I promise.

If I were in your class and you said "the whole numbers" but meant the negatives too, that'd probably give me pause (dumb American), but I have such herculean powers of intuition that I probably wouldn't even ask you a question about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My comment was mostly in jest, it came out all wonky, I shouldnt post sleep deprived :p

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Oh, it's no problem :p

I don't think I've seen Etymonline before, so I should thank you for introducing me to it. I do really like etymology, actually.