Science Memes

10340 readers

2737 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

855

Zero to hero (mander.xyz)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

134 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Wait, I thought everything in math is rigorously and unambiguously defined?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's a hole at the bottom of math.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There’s a frog on the log on the hole on the bottom of math. There’s a frog on the log on the hole on the bottom of math. A frog. A frog. There’s a frog on the log on the hole on the bottom of math.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Rigorously, yes. Unambiguously, no. Plenty of words (like continuity) can mean different things in different contexts. The important thing isn’t the word, it’s that the word has a clear definition within the context of a proof. Obviously you want to be able to communicate ideas clearly and so a convention of symbols and terms have been established over time, but conventions can change over time too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Platonism Vs Intuitionism would like a word.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Yes, and like any science it gets revisited and contested periodically.