this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)
Daily Maths Challenges
189 readers
1 users here now
Share your cool maths problems.
Complete a challenge:
- Post your solution in comments, if it is exactly the same as OP's solution, let us know.
- Have fun.
Post a challenge:
- Doesn't have to be original, as long as it is not a duplicate.
- Challenges not riddles, if the post is longer than 3 paragraphs, reconsider yourself.
- Optionally include solution in comments, let it be clear this is not a homework help forums.
- Tag [unsolved] if you don't have a solution yet.
- Please include images, if your question includes complex symbols, attach a render of the maths.
Feel free to contribute to a series by DMing the OP, or start your own challenge series.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The text of this post appears wrong on old.lemmy.world. It says "
Solve x for x^x*x^x^ = 2
" with no superscripts. It appears correctly on lemmy.world.I assume we're meant to find an expression of W() and square roots and stuff, which expresses an exact answer. Since finding a decimal approximation somewhere between 1 and 2 using a binary search would be too easy.
I believe it is:
spoiler
e^W(W(ln(2))
spoiler
x^x=e^W(ln(2))
isn't wrong, but it's in a form that's inconvenient to say the least.Picking up from
x*ln(x)=W(ln(2))
spoiler
spoiler
x^x
is a far superior substitution, but it takes a bit to notice it