this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
709 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

11161 readers
2861 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
709
Hey there gamers (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Alright smartgauss let's see you do the same for all real numbers

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Infinity, and beyond!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

IEEE 754 says Not a Number

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

0, because for every positive real number there's a negative counterpart

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

It is not well defined. Because an order of summation is not given you could just as easily sum pairs of (0,1), (-1,2), (-2,3), (-3,4)... (-x, x+1) and conclude you are constantly adding 1 to your total so it goes to infinity instead

Or do the reverse of (-1,0), (-2,1), ... (-x-1, x) and get that the each pair adds -1 so the sum goes to negative Infinity

Order of the addition sometimes changes infinite sums. Infinitely large things are weird sometimes