this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
645 points (100.0% liked)
196
16441 readers
1603 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This isn't universally true. There were less incidences of general tooth decay due to different microflora than we have now, but people absolutely still got dental issues that would result in systemic infections and death.
Sure. Tropical people have always had fruit, some had sugar cane. People fought and their teeth were damaged
But dental cavities and abscesses are caused by sugar in your mouth, and bread has always been good at getting stuck between people's teeth, while their saliva converts the starches to sugars
Archaeologists determine whether a skeleton came from a hunter gatherer or a settled farmer by their teeth
Microflora in your mouth - perhaps they did have different, there's no evidence, but if so I would guess that one's mouth microflora changes depending on what one eats
Note that the process that damages teeth is fermentation - where sugar is fermented, liberating energy, carbonic acid. That doesn't happen in the absence of sugar that persists in your mouth
Yeah that's what I meant
So your "their teeth were good due to different microflora" can be simplified to "their teeth were good because they didn't have tooth damaging food"
The original claim was dental issues were generally a death sentence, which was true whether or not they're more common now.