this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
77 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
262 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's a one-time fee that also earns money back compared to the continuous payments to buy from other sources.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Assuming China doesn't have to spend literally any other money, even though countries are constantly investing in infrastructure and security and material to assist the business.

But also, literally not free. My point stands.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You won't just stop the maintenance if TikTok didn't exist. It's not like all China cares about is data.

Your question was "why would China get data from TikTok when they can just buy it from Meta". If China didn't get the data from ByteDance, ByteDance still incurs the maintenance fee. So no, that is not the expense of getting the data.