this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
67 points (90.4% liked)

MapPorn

3162 readers
2 users here now

Discover Cartographic Marvels and Navigate New Worlds!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
67
The global spread of the Indo-european language family (cdn.masto.host)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The global spread of the Indo-european language family

@mapporn

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing, it doesn't list the colonizers there, because in terms of numbers, they're irrelevant...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, let's ignore the whole of the Americas and Australia.

Lots of people in African ex colonies are native speakers of Portuguese and French. I presume this was already the case in 1950.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Then I guess, I was guessing wrong? I'm not trying to claim anything and I did specify "there", because I did notice the Americas and Australia. I assumed, the definition of "native speaker" was maybe a bit special here...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's confusing specially because it highlights south africa but nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My thinking was that South Africa might have had more immigrants from Europe and such than e.g. Congo. At least, I believe, South Africa is particularly known for having many white folks there. But yeah, I'm also just spitballing...