Privacy

31772 readers

354 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

101

Are there no fully working map apps besides gmaps? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Old post is here: https://lemmy.world/post/14437575

Both OSM and Organic Maps are SEVERELY lacking in businesses. So many places aren't in the directory.

You search for fast food and only a couple pop up. Search for s fancy steakhouse by name, nothing. It shows about half of the weed dispensaries in my area...

Is there a way to update the "phonebook"?

Has shitgle been spending money trying to make all other maps unusable? It sure fuckin seems like it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, but as you say, they have a good privacy policy. Also their revenue model backs up their privacy policy, and I find their reasoning as to why they aren't FOSS fair:

Will Magic Earth be Open Source?

No; since it is also used commercially (we have a paid Magic Earth SDK for business partners), we cannot make the code public.

(from the FAQ)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's just saying "we want to sell access to our code, so we can't make it open source". Basically the definition of proprietary software, no?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yes? Nobody was claiming they weren't proprietary.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

My point was that it's not so much "fair reasoning" as just a statement of that fact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, but people were claiming they had a good reason not to be FOSS. They could have easily just not mentioned it at all but instead they name a reason that isn't an issue for many others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

That's a weird reasoning, as I can find plenty of FOSS that has paid "business" editions