Fallout

2244 readers

1 users here now

All things about Fallout series.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Fallout: New Vegas & Fallout Television Series (SPOILERS FOR BOTH) (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In the sixth episode of the show, we found out about Shady Sands' fall in 2277. Four years before New Vegas starts. This retcons New Vegas. No one in the NCR talks about how their capital got nuked in NV. In the quest You'll Know It When It Happens, the president of the New California Republic visits the Hoover Dam. Why would the president visit the dam after the capital got attacked? Hell, why is the NCR still in the Mojave Wasteland? It doesn't make sense. So yes the show does retcons New Vegas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

so that pretty much answers the question, doesn’t it?

No. The only date we have is 2277. So based on the info we have right now. Shady Sands got nuked in 2277.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is that because you don't accept what Todd Howard and Christopher Nolan said about the timeline?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Lol probably. Classic "It's not MY ideal canon, therefore, regardless of official confirmation, I refuse to believe anything else!" fanboy syndrom. I.e. the worst kind of fanboy.

[+] [email protected] -10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Why not just say it in the show. It will make things so clearer. But no they can't do that. Also in the IGN article, he gives no date. So the only date we do have at this time is 2277.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

ok but nobody said in the show that it was nuked in 2277, either. ya'll are upset by your interpretation of a number written on a blackboard by an unknown character.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Okay, fair enough. I do agree it's ambiguous, but I don't draw the same conclusion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

A lot of things in the show are ambiguous and only very clear to people who played the games. Please stop with this fake outrage culture.