this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
271 points (94.7% liked)

Games

16637 readers
518 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
271
Original Fallout lead Tim Cain loves the new show, but remains baffled by how 'destructive' fans can act toward 'people who are trying to create things' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Cain appreciated the performances and storytelling, but singled out how the show nailed the Fallout "vibe" as its biggest achievement. "I was just looking at all the props," he said of one scene. "I realized after a few minutes went by that I had not followed the dialogue at all, because I was so engrossed by it visually."

On a more sour note, Cain took time to address the way fans of the series can behave poorly online, particularly regarding any perceived rivalry between Fallout entries developed by Bethesda (3, 4, and 76), and those from Interplay, Black Isle, and Obsidian (1, 2, and New Vegas). Cain spoke positively of Todd Howard, and said that "Some of the stuff you [series fans] say online is so off." See also: the debate about whether the show somehow overrode or ignored the events of those non-Bethesda games, which has since been denied by a senior developer at the studio.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

i’m pretty sure the subtext of “woke” is “there are women and non-white people here”

same with “dei,” i suppose - all goes back to not liking women and poc 🙃

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

i’m pretty sure the subtext of “woke” is “there are women and non-white people here”

Or that the women in it aren't explicitly tailored to their tastes. There's a post going around some places about someone trying to "correct" the image of one of the characters to make them less "woke" (they were wearing a baggy jumpsuit). The resulting character's back-end looks like it's been plastiform sealed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

i had forgotten all about Alloy and…was it Lara Croft?…and people “correcting” their appearances, good point!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing this is it. The setting is a 1950's culture but without the racism and sexism that were rampant at the time. Women and POC holding significant positions in the corporate world, which never would've happened in the actual 1950s. It is a fictional world, of course. People seem to forget that.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Which doesn't really make sense given how jingoistic and rabidly anticommunist the pre war 1950s United States is depicted as being.

Why would such a country ever end racial segregation, let alone permit LGBT acceptance? That would require a massive cultural shift, that is worth at least an entire episode of its own. Without such an explanation it just doesn't really make sense

The show is fake and made up, and so are the games, obviously. But the racial and sexual acceptance depicted doesn't really make sense. Obviously there's no problem in depicted characters that aren't cishet white men. But why would such characters ever be treated as equal in such a fascist depiction of the United States?