this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
870 points (97.5% liked)
Comic Strips
12583 readers
3028 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- [email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
- [email protected]: memes (you don't say!)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Supposedly dodo was actually horrible. They found journals of people bitching about it
then why are they trying to bring it back along with the mammoth?
Contrast?
Guilt.
Research fund money.
It's a sliding scale.
Asking if they could, but not if they should
(They should, just to flex on the British)
Looney tunes needs live ones to train its new AI character
You're unable to think of a reason other than for our own gluttony...? It would be super fucked up to bring them back just for the reason to eat them. Seriously, that's some deeply disturbing horror shit. And somehow that's the only thing you can imagine?
As apposed to “for the science”… which actually is one of the major tropes in horror? Quite possibly one of the oldest (though supernatural horrors were the first.)
Even if I were that dense… these people are forgetting to ask if they should bring that specific species back. There are so many others to choose from; they went with the media hype rather the useful-science route.
It’s unlikely that the dodo’s ecological role hasn’t already been filled by something else in the 4+ centuries it’s been absent.
Its return to the wild would likely pressure otherwise extant species that have stepped into that roll; and it’s unlikely to survive in the wild anyway- it’s not like we’ve stopped altering the world in its absence.
So that will relegate a species relatively artificial existence to being research or a novelty- a curiosity in zoos or food or something else. Maybe even an exclusive private island tourist trap…
If they had tasted good, they'd still be alive today in cages, waiting to be slaughtered.
...maybe we did them a favor.
Nah, they'd still be extinct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_pigeon#Hunting
Even if adjusted for inflation, 31 cents a dozen doesn't sound like a lot, but then market saturation happened and your prediction came to pass:
Those who don't learn from the past are something something
The best thing for a species survival in this world is for it to taste good to us.
Plant, animal, fungi, whatever