this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
823 points (98.5% liked)

science

14445 readers
1 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (5 children)

sick. cool. So uh. How long until power generation happens now?

Ah who am i kidding, it'll be at least a decade, probably more like two. Three including manufacturing and building all the plants.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Well according to the 1993 classic, "SimCity 2000," fusion power becomes available to build in the year 2050. Since I have no other source that provides an exact date of viability, this remians the most reliable prediction we have.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

curious, has SimCity predicted anything correctly up to now?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If my experience with the game was an accurate account, quite a few natural disasters.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Wasn't that the one with the godzilla natural disaster toggle? If so, i figure the next few years could have some fun surprises... if we're lucky.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

The bell riots, September 2024. See yall there!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

When did space solar unlock? The uk is building one now apparently

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

i like this meta, i agree.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah who am i kidding, it’ll be at least a decade, probably more like two.

To be fair, they're trying to create a miniature star and keep it controlled/contained, to use its energy. That's some next-gen level stuff.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it's definitely one of the ideas of all time. i just wish people would stop pretending like it's "just right around the corner"

Meanwhile germany is burning more coal than it ever has to generate power because they no longer have nuclear energy. And gas is expensive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Stay in school kids. Study Physics & Engineering!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

yep. Given how long it'll take to develop fusion power, multiple generations of people will have worked on it in practice, and many more in theory.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Gonna need a hell of a boiler/turbine to harness that kind of heat.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

thats the LEAST of my concerns lmao.

Gonna need one hell of a setup to even produce that level of heat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It was 30 years away in the 1950s and still is.
Controlled fusion is harder than we thought & may be harder than we think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

its right 100% of the time 60% of the time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is how we arrive at the "always 30 years away" trope.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's also just kind of how these things tend to go. I mean even the the funny international one ITER. Has had this exact issue, they keep pushing back deadlines over and over again. Which is only really surprising if you aren't familiar with the tech, it's highly complex. But it's a great example as to why this stuff happens.