this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
161 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
412 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I can do everything Kagi does for free...using SearXNG.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

How do you duplicate this feature in SearXNG? https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/website-info-personalized-results.html

It's basically the major thing keeping me with Kagi.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That seems like a crutch instead of a real feature. I hate even just thinking about having to manage that. What if you want info from sites you do not already know about? Seems like finding new things through search is basically dead anymore.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Websites I've never heard of come up very frequently. The feature I find highly useful involves a) hiding shitty disinformation websites as I encounter them, or blocking sites like pintrest, and b) elevating results from websites I like, like having letterboxd results rank higher than IMDB when I search for movies or whatEVER.

Being able to customize my own results to favour what I'm actually looking for is such a crutch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that exactly what the "weight" in searXNG does?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

weight

Where can I find that setting? I don't see anything like that anywhere in the UI. If it's in the config files and not in the UI, that isn't particularly useful to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's in the UI on the Engines tab. However, you can only see it there, you still have to use the config file to actually change it, sorry. That's not hard at all though.

If you don't see this option, perhaps you're running an older version? I'm running the latest docker.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I think this is different to what I'm talking about. Seems like the weight in SearXNG impacts search engines used, where what I'm talking about is in regards to the actual results. So I could prioritize or deprioritize websites which tend to produce good or bad results, block domains, pin favourites, etc. The example I used elsewhere is like having letterboxd results rank higher than IMDB when I search for movies

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah I see. I didn't really understand the requirement. That would indeed be a nice one though pretty hard to configure for general search because the results can come from so many sources.

As well as that, for special-purpose things like movies it does in fact have a ranking for those by querying common sites like IMDB directly as an engine. So in that case you can use the weighting system to show preference. It doesn't seem to support letterboxd as a source but it does some others:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's cool, but I'd still prefer not to be wrangling a dozen or so engines with bangs and editing config files when I could do it all through the UI in a more intuitive way. While I don't mind initial setup, I have very little appetite for endless tweaking of config files. So while I'll keep an eye on SearXNG and occasionally pull it onto my server, Kagi can continue being my daily driver for now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I understand, Kagi is a good service!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So I only have to find one thing Kagi can do, that SearXNG can't?
Then what?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

SearXNG is probably at the very core of Kagi; with a bunch of extra code and UI on top of it. Bangs work as well as lenses, including external bangs. If you can dream of an engine; you can use it with SearXNG; creating an engine with it is documented well.

I promise any single thing Kagi can do that SearXNG can't or won't; won't matter. SearXNG is superior to Kagi in every way by cost, and by being free, open source, and functionally all you need.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

So it doesn't actually matter if Kagi can do something SearXNG can't.
It's cheaper. No argument with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I always thought Kagi used that money to build their complete own index.

Now I hear that their index is only tiny and it's mostly just delegated searches? Why does it cost so much then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have the big SearXNG portal bookmarked ( https://searx.space/ ) but I don't find that I ever reach for it that often. Not being able to cull lower quality sites is just a little bit of extra toil I'm happy to pay to go away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You do have to host it yourself or run your own personal instance to get the power of SearXNG; if you've not tried this, please do not write it off.

If hosting it yourself or even running it locally in a container on your machine at home is too technical for you; nobody is going to bane you for that. In fact there's several guides and videos out there that might help you if you're inclined to learn.

If not; you're also free to continue consuming as you do.