this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
346 points (100.0% liked)

196

16597 readers
1783 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I’m ugly and have self-esteem issues

That’s eugenics. Choosing not to reproduce for genetic reasons.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Choosing to not have kids yourself, for whatever reason, is definitely not eugenics. I don't even get how you'd come to this idea.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I don't think you can really apply eugenics to yourself. It's more something that one exerts on others.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

yes. and to be clear, it’s not eugenics to make that choice yourself. problem starts as soon as it becomes about others though. seen far too many internet conversations go from

  • “i won’t reproduce” to
  • “it’s my responsibility not to reproduce” to
  • “it’s our responsibility not to reproduce” to
  • “the poor and disabled should be sterilized.”

this post is already getting pretty damn close to step 3 right there. reddit was awful for this so i encourage us to just be aware when stuff like this comes up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Alternately: choosing to reproduce for genetic reasons. Positive eugenics is still eugenics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

Historically, eugenicists have attempted to alter human gene pools by excluding people and groups judged to be inferior or promoting those judged to be superior.

Emphasis mine, though seems people rarely get called out for the latter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I meant that in a 'no woman would want me' way and not in 'I don't want to propagate my genes' way.