this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)
C & C++
889 readers
6 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Apparently it is impossible for this kind of functions to be defined as friends of classes:
After trying different combinations, it seems that I managed to get it working with the condition the whole template are considered friends of the class. I don't know if I should consider it a language problem, but it seems that way, since the template restrictions (in this case) are minor.
Do you think I found an error in the language?
Ah, nice idea. I've tried a few different ways of doing this, and I think what you're seeing is a discrepancy in how the compiler handles member access into incomplete types. It seems that, in your examples, the compiler is allowing
-> decltype(f.private_msg)
within the class, but I think it's not selectingdo_something
outside of it because it usesdecltype(t.private_msg)
. In my case, I'm not even able to do that within the class.For example, since I'm not able to use
decltype(f.private_msg)
inside the class, I'm usingdecltype(private_msg)
instead, which causes an error at thedo_something
declaration related to incomplete type (presumably because of thet.private_msg
usage):My reasoning is that removing the
t.private_msg
from the declaration works:The reason your second example works is because the friend template inside the class acts as a template declaration rather than a specialization, which isn't specialized until after
Foo
is complete: