Damn, that's interesting!

4699 readers

1 users here now

No clickbait
No Racism and Hate speech
No Imgur Gallery Links
No Infographics
Moderator Discretion
Repost Guidelines
No videos over 15 minutes long
No "Photoshopped" posts
Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

422

Birthplaces of the 100 fastest 10km runners of all time (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

9 Conclusion There is no firm basis available in evidence to indicate that trans women have a consistent and measurable overall performance benefit after 12 months of testosterone suppression. While an advantage in terms of Lean Body Mass (LBM), Cross Section Area (CSA) and strength may persist statistically after 12 months, there is no evidence that this translates to any performance advantage as compared to elite cis-women athletes of similar size and height

They're resorting to saying "trans women are stronger than their competitors, but how do we even know that being stronger is advantageous in sport???"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You need to work on your reading comprehension. XD

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you think that an advantage in terms of strength translates to any performance advantage?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think that "maybe" having an advantage in terms of strength is an admission that the research is incomplete.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The document is full of admissions that the research is incomplete.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Hence, my comment to Sentau's question about the research.