this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Guns for Leftists

1131 readers
1 users here now

For sharing and discussing about firearms.

Rules;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My general impression is that guns are pretty hard to get, which makes it very safe, but also a disarmed populace can be bad. Is it hypocritical to oppose the disarmament of one population, but not another?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

China has a dictatorship of the proletariat. The Red Army is the armed wing of the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is disarmed.

I think the USSR had local people's militias, but that made a lot of sense given the context of the invasions they faced.

Individual gun ownership is not necessarily helpful for a revolution, and exists for the historical purpose of primitive accumulation and enclosure with guns being a means to protect property of individuals. The proletariat collectively owns so the defense of the people's organized property should also be organized, in general. The disarmament as an exercise of force should be done by the terms of the proletariat.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Good response, thanks!