Damn, that's interesting!

4699 readers

1 users here now

No clickbait
No Racism and Hate speech
No Imgur Gallery Links
No Infographics
Moderator Discretion
Repost Guidelines
No videos over 15 minutes long
No "Photoshopped" posts
Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

422

Birthplaces of the 100 fastest 10km runners of all time (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did you mean 'yes'. Because the article you share concludes that trans women have no advantage which is greater than other biological advantages

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

the article you share concludes that trans women have no advantage which is greater than other biological advantages

Noit doesn't. You are misrepresenting it, or misuing the word 'concludes'. It never says anything like "we conclude' that there is no advantage". The actual conclusion is on p40-41 and can more honestly be phrased as "we cannot conclude that there's a definite advantage. Strength is a possible exception, but how do we even know strength is relevant to sport?" ("Additional biomarkers (such as handgrip strength, hip angle, bone density) have been used uncritically in positivist biological studies to demonstrate cis men’s purported biological advantages over cis women, but there is not sufficient evidence these measures are salient to the question of trans women’s participation.")