this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
461 points (89.7% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/16660104

Consider supporting Lemmy development or donating to your local server if you have the means. Peace!

Liberapay (preferred)
Open Collective
Patreon
Crypto.

Stats source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 7 months ago (25 children)

The Lemmy devs are a bunch of tankie weirdos, so I'm definitely not going to give money to them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (14 children)

Thanks. I was about to post that I haven’t yet decided whether to donate to my instance or the developers. I might just go with your opinion

Edit: although after reading, I’m not entirely sure. Part of supporting freedom to discuss is also supporting freedom to discuss things you disagree with or even things that are genuinely hateful. I do tend to end up more on the free speech side than the cancel side. The posted thread from archive at least the complainant moved on: we need to be able to vote with our feet like that

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Lemmy.ml is the devs instance, and they have a habit of banning anyone who even slightly differs from their opinions. Basically, if you're not a tankie like them, they will likely ban you.

They're not interested in free discussions.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But they just personally don't want that on their instance while they create the lemmy software that allows for everyone to speak their opinions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They have an extremely low bar for censorship, and I have already seen signs that they will abuse their role to keep their finger on the scale. For example, they selectively federate mod logs, and seem to be running a custom build which allows them to do this. What other forms of fediverse trust are they willing to compromise for ideological purity?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you have any evidence for this, or are you just looking at mod logs across instances? There have been about a billion little things that have slowed or stopped content from sharing properly over the history of this system so far—how can you be sure there is malevolence on their part and not simply a bug that hasn’t been patched?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Spoiler: They don't. They are also not letting the absence of facts hinder them from claiming stuff to be true. Subsequently they worry about why their comments are being moderated.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)