this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
173 points (97.8% liked)

Videos

14114 readers
1 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.
  4. Don't be a jerk
  5. No advertising
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

As a former architecture teacher, all I have to say about those rotating house is that they’re dumb AF, costing a fortune in energy spending.

The landscape moves. So does your head on your neck, and your eyeballs in your skull, and your ass on your legs.

Pure stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

costing a fortune in energy spending.

I'm curious where the energy waste comes in. The owner says it only takes a 1HP motor to move the building, so I can't imagine its very power hungry. What am I missing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Horsepower doesn't measure the total energy needed to rotate the house because it doesn't capture the amount of time the motor runs for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is it of the point about being in architect to design somewhat dumb things.

Architects always keep trying to reinvent bridge just so they don't have to make the same bridge twice. The best design for a house is a cube made out of concrete, but we don't build like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They have played us for absolute fools.