this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
895 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

11243 readers
2940 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
895
puns (mander.xyz)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
109 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

My dad was never at university, but he was a unix admin for ages. his naming conventions for clusters?

Star Wars characters.
Red Dwarf Characters.
Star trek characters.
Asimov's robots.
and apparently, his annoying bosses. (For the troublesome clusters.)

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've heard it's a "pets vs cattle" thing. When you have a small fleet of distinct servers, you name them. When you have a thousand interchangeable boxes, you give them systematic IDs.

Or you scale up to a franchise with a large enough cast. I wonder if anyone uses One Piece character names for servers?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It kind of also depends on how you interact with them- some clusters are interacted with by admin as a single entity; those got names even if they technically represented lots of rackspace; or the hardware that's running specific groupings of services.

Like a databases. (Darth Vader was reserved for databases that logged and tracked errors.... aka other systems that were, uh, rebellions.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You give systematic id's to completely interchangable things. You give unique names to unique things.

If you name a formal thing (like a physical computer) by its function you have failed at naming. And are probably a manager who doesn't see that one day you'll need many things of almost the same function and to tell them apart. Or that one thing will have many functions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

username checks out