this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
-14 points (6.2% liked)

Conservative

384 readers
55 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And? Did you read the article? Do you have an opinion on the content ? Otherwise, this is a bad faith comment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As if Infowars isn't the poster child for bad faith everything

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And what about the article is incorrect ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The part where it's written by an outfit that is literally being liquidated by the courts for spouting fake news

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How to say you didn’t read the article without saying it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No one that's above brain dead is going to read anything by Infowars.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If you won’t read the article then you don’t have an educated option. You’re not acting in good faith.

The article is the same one posted by other sites as well. It’s a copy of the post on x (twitter)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Then post the other articles instead :)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I didn’t post the article. Whining about the source without reading the article is just intellectually dishonest. Focus on the content.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Oh man you're totally right. I realize now how incorrect and foolish I am. I'm glad you explained it so thoroughly and showed me the error of my ways. I can't believe I could be so blind and ignorant. I am a changed man. Thank you so much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This entire comm is based solely on acting in bad faith. Don't even try with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Avoiding reading info wars is actually better.

Being uninformed is better than being misinformed. Info wars will never inform anyone. You cannot get an educated opinion out of a source of misinformation.