Collapse

3240 readers

1 users here now

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.

Related lemmys:

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

220

I’m a climate scientist. If you knew what I know, you’d be terrified too (edition.cnn.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Editor’s Note: Bill McGuire is professor emeritus of geophysical & climate hazards at University College London and author of “Hothouse Earth: An Inhabitant’s Guide.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Okay but... this is the one that legit may end human habitation on this planet. Ukraine, Gaza, even "but muh economy" and world-wide slavery all kinda pale by comparison.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

The difference is that this "may end", while Ukraine and Gaza are killing lots of innocents.

Also, we have the technological means to stop this one if we really want to. We just don't want to.

Aerosol spraying for $1B a year can buy time.

Spending $100B a year for a decade on nuclear power plants built to Chinese/Korean safety standards in addition to current spending on solar, wind and electrification can stop our emissions in two decades.

Which is why it is good that this author is writing this article. We must fight apathy against climate change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

And there should be capacity to do multiple things at once - e.g. lessen dependence upon Chinese computer chip manufacturing and curb Russian aggression for a fraction of the cost that it would have been later after it succeeded in conquering Ukraine and set some kind of limit on giving billions of aid to eliminate people living in Gaza and do some kind of absolute bare minimum effort to save the planet from our abuses of it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

100b will buy you nothing. That's like a tenth of Us military budget.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Indeed.

We can easily solve climate change if we are willing to spend a tenth on it compared to what we spend on defense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Where did you get that number. It's obviously wrong.

[+] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The heating alone would do that, yes. It's the knock-on effects. As CO~2~ rises, the ocean slowly acidifies. As the ocean increasingly acidifies, oxygen producing lifeforms (approximately 70% of the oxygen we consume is produced in the ocean) increasingly die out. The Amazon Rainforest (a large producer of oxygen on land) is on fire. What will we breathe? It's an ecological apocolypse, not merely from getting hot (which your comment seriously underestimates the direct effects of) but from the previously mentioned oxygen crash, and hundreds of other effects that we know about and can reliably predict.

edit: some light reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

You left out increasingly unpredictable weather patterns that would make it harder to grow crops and vegetables.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

DarkNightoftheSoul already helpfully answered that (with link attribution!:-) but I did want to add that I never said that it would - I said that it may, as in in the absolute worst case scenario. By comparison, the ending of a nation, like Ukraine, Russia, the USA, or China, pales by comparison, given how on the other side we are talking something affecting all human habitation on the planet, with the worst case scenario possible being to bring it to an end, though even if that doesn't happen there will be other effects. Like for one, perhaps no more coffee or chocolate, which historically were grown closer rather than farther from those equatorial zones that you mentioned. Even if the thought of billions of deaths doesn't motivate us, at the very least the thought of losing our cafe mocha lattes should!