Privacy

31990 readers

467 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Fastmail vs Proton Mail (lemm.ee)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Who of you uses one of the above services, what do you think of it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I've never used Fastmail, so I cannot comment on that but I just closed my Proton account because of their donation to Bellingcat. It might not be a problem for some but it was for me.

https://propagandainfocus.com/proton-mail-imperialist-stooge/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it looks like Proton does not choose the beneficiaries. From their statement:

‘Recipients are nominated by the Proton community and selected based on community feedback. Proton doesn’t nominate the recipients. Recipients cannot be changed after the raffle begins and the fact that some find Bellingcat controversial was not known beforehand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

While in theory it is nice that an organisation would give over so much power to its customers in terms of where donations go, it does come with the risk of problematic decisions being made. Then later, when they've boxed themselves into a corner, quite unnecessarily, all they can do is go along with what their customers decide and then pass on the morality of that decision to those customers. But that's not really good enough to say "My customers made me do it!" No, you gave your customers too much power in the first place. It's a privacy organisation so surely better to give some money to a group that supports and compliments your aims. Bellingcat (regardless of the problems raised in the article I posted) has nothing to with privacy. If people read the article and decide they are happy with Proton, then go for it. I'd rather people make a decision with their eyes open.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

While I kinda like what Bellingcat does, you do have a point. Crowdsourcing decisions rarely lead to good outcomes