this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

104 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
88
OpenAI says it could ‘cease operating’ in the EU if it can’t comply with future regulation (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In addition to the possible business threat, forcing OpenAI to identify its use of copyrighted data would expose the company to potential lawsuits. Generative AI systems like ChatGPT and DALL-E are trained using large amounts of data scraped from the web, much of it copyright protected. When companies disclose these data sources it leaves them open to legal challenges. OpenAI rival Stability AI, for example, is currently being sued by stock image maker Getty Images for using its copyrighted data to train its AI image generator.

Aaaaaand there it is. They don’t want to admit how much copyrighted materials they’ve been using.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am very open to discussion on this, and if anyone has a counter-argument, I'd love to hear it, because this is a new field of technology that we should all talk about and learn to understand better.

That's very cool and all but while we have this debate there are artists getting ripped off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You aren't having a debate. You're blindly claiming that artists are getting ripped off, because maybe they are a bit, or maybe they're latching onto any reason that lets them still have professional careers in 30 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not making blind claims. And I won't point you to the sources either. I'm not making any homework for anyone today. Dig the subject and post us some information if you are really into the debate thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you can provide some sources with real data from people that have proven a loss of income due to getting "ripped off" by AI, I'd love to look over it. Until then, it's a witch hunt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can provide you with reddit posts from artists who are replaced by AI.

Would you like it served with a cup of tea and some sandwiches?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have some that have actual proof in them, sure. That's exactly what I'm looking for. However, if it amounts to nothing more than hearsay, then no, I don't think I want them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had you spent a minimum of time digging the subject you would know exactly what I'm talking about.

I'm not making your sandwich for you, you will have to make your sandwich yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Burden of proof being what it is, I'll leave the sandwich making to those with the meat and bread.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I won't take any burden for your majesty. Do your homework.