196

16593 readers

2189 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

466

Now let's see Paul Allen's rule (feddit.de)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Don't forget about Fallout 1+2. They're about as janky as Planescape: Torment, but still great games.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Don't forget [two perfect masterpieces]. They're about as janky as [another perfect masterpiece].

I... guess I agree?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just played through 1 and 2 and they are far from perfect but they are damn good games

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I remember losing Fallout 2 because one of the stat boosting items got lost from my inventory so I spent a month trying to track it down instead of saving my village.

Fuck them kids anyways.

[–] sus 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I gotta be honest. I love New Vegas and FO1 but I gave up on 2 somewhere around Vault City. I'm sure the game has it's good moments, but the total whiplash of all the proto "so Random XD" humor got to me. I don't mind some random wackyness in FO, it just has to actually be funny.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's a hot take I 100% agree with. Fallout 1 nailed the vibe and was perfect from start to finish. While 2 has a ton of great moments (Frank Horrigan is amazing), it isn't as totally consistent.

New Vegas married the two quite nicely.