this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
351 points (100.0% liked)

Actually Useful AI

2011 readers
7 users here now

Welcome! ๐Ÿค–

Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, "actually useful" for developers and enthusiasts alike.

Be an active member! ๐Ÿ””

We highly value participation in our community. Whether it's asking questions, sharing insights, or sparking new discussions, your engagement helps us all grow.

What can I post? ๐Ÿ“

In general, anything related to AI is acceptable. However, we encourage you to strive for high-quality content.

What is not allowed? ๐Ÿšซ

General Rules ๐Ÿ“œ

Members are expected to engage in on-topic discussions, and exhibit mature, respectful behavior. Those who fail to uphold these standards may find their posts or comments removed, with repeat offenders potentially facing a permanent ban.

While we appreciate focus, a little humor and off-topic banter, when tasteful and relevant, can also add flavor to our discussions.

Related Communities ๐ŸŒ

General

Chat

Image

Open Source

Please message @[email protected] if you would like us to add a community to this list.

Icon base by Lord Berandas under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Wikipedia has downgraded tech website CNET's reliability rating following extensive discussions among its editors regarding the impact of AI-generated content on the site's trustworthiness, as noted in a detailed report from Futurism.

The decision reflects concerns over the reliability of articles found on the tech news outlet after it began publishing AI-generated stories in 2022.

Shortly after the CNET news broke in January 2023, Wikipedia editors began a discussion thread on the Reliable Sources project page about the publication.

"CNET, usually regarded as an ordinary tech RS [reliable source], has started experimentally running AI-generated articles, which are riddled with errors," wrote a Wikipedia editor named David Gerard.

Futurism reports that the issue with CNET's AI-generated content also sparked a broader debate within the Wikipedia community about the reliability of sources owned by Red Ventures, such as Bankrate and CreditCards.com.

In response to the downgrade and the controversies surrounding AI-generated content, CNET issued a statement that claims that the site maintains high editorial standards.


The original article contains 528 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[โ€“] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

Read the room, bot

[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Yer unreliable! Ya hear that, m8?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago