this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
7 points (88.9% liked)

Te Upoko o te Ika a Māui / Wellington

401 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !wellington, a place to share and discuss anything about Te Upoko o te Ika a Māui / Wellington in general.

Rules:

Banner image by Rob Suisted

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
7
Key details of plan to rejuvenate the Reading Courtenay complex made public (wellington.govt.nz)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The key features of the deal are:

  • WCC will buy the land from Reading for NZ$32m. This is based on the valuation we received that it is worth $31.9m. M
  • Reading will lease the land back from WCC on a 21-year perpetually renewable lease.
  • The annual rent paid by Reading will cover WCC’s borrowing and other costs so that it is fiscally neutral to ratepayers.
  • Reading has the first right to buy back the land anytime within the first 15 years of the lease.
  • WCC can sell the land to someone else any time after the first 10 years of the lease.
  • The deal provides that WCC will only complete the agreement and pay the balance of funds to Reading once we have been satisfied that the new building design meets the civic outcomes we want and has resource consent.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's not the first time I've heard of it, but I guess I'm just trying to understand the reasoning. You've mentioned "freeing up capital", which I guess is a way of saying they own the land but can't afford to pay for the new building, and can't get a loan as it's too risky for the bank. So they sell the land and lease it back, then spend the proceeds on the building. They are in the same position as if they had taken out a loan, but the council has taken on the risk of the venture as they are the one needing to pay back the loan if Readings go broke.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Correct, although they will hopefully be able to lease the land to someone else, so they're only on the hook for the time between tenants