this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
1394 points (93.7% liked)
tumblr
3488 readers
188 users here now
Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
-
No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.
Sister Communities:
-
/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/[email protected] - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm just waiting for all those Michigan voters threatening Biden right now to go through with it.
I'm not American, I'd be really curious to see the shocked Pikachu faces when those people are rounded up and deported by the fascist dictator they'd be tacitly supporting.
I would be very worried that, in the state of Michigan, Trump racked up 750k votes while Biden was only able to drag in 620k. When you consider the 100k votes for "Uncommitted" and the 40k votes for Biden-alternatives, that's not looking great.
It looks even worse when you consider the 2020 results - 840k Biden to 577k Bernie. Joe looks like he's hemorrhaging support in that state. Palestine very well may cost him the state and potentially the Presidency.
Compare that to Trump's 110k gain from 2020. Dude's picking up speed while Democrats just kinda fuck around, waiting to find out.
Governor Whitmer has been far more savvy in her outreach to the state's Muslim community. I doubt she'd roll over to a Trump DHS trying to deport a big chunk of her constituents.
But if you're a Muslim down in Texas or out in Florida or Arizona, I would be feeling incredibly anxious.
Ah yes I guess they would have deserved it.
Liberal and victim blaming, name a more iconic duo. People who vote for fascism are responsible for fascism. Quit blackmailing people.
Also feeling "curious" at the idea of people getting shot is pretty psychopathic
Well ya, after years of warnings if y'all allow Trump back into office.... you deserve what you collectively get.
You can call me psychopathic, I'm fine with that. Myself along with the rest of the world will be watching America with baited breath in case it follows that loser airman and lights itself on fire because it fell for the bullshit.
Also i am not american either. It just hit home because the same is happening in france, with liberals using the far-right as scarecrow while enacting the same politics as them.
Come on buddy nobody deserve fascism. I know its tempting to get into this revengeful mindset but you cannot blame people not to vote for liberals either. Fascists are responsible for electing fascists, nobody else. And one might even question the free-will of the voter when there is so much propaganda around.
No, you're actually a completely wrong here. If a fascist gets into office, it's because of the failure of the society in general that allowed it to happen .
If you don't want a fascist to be the one running your country, then elect someone who is in a fascist if you're going to come back with well, the laws are this and the gerrymanders are that........ Well guess what You're in the midst of failing to prevent it from happening. So grab those damn bootstraps and do something about it.
I'm a couple of miles further away from a fascist taking off where I live, so I'm watching with fascination as you all clearly want to elect someone that hates you and will destroy the lives of many Americans. You're welcome to do it and when the whole world blames Americans for the choice that America made, you don't get to say that's not my fault.
Whatever, dear, do what you think is right. Have a good evening
If Biden wins again, that would put pressure on Republicans to reevaluate how they've been operating.
That might mean doubling down, but it could also mean changing by shedding their most extreme views and candidates, and moving back towards the middle, or just eventually imploding and having another party take its place.
Can you name a time when a party significantly shifted their platform after a loss?
Seems like "double down" is the only option they choose, at least in my lifetime.
If Trump wins we slide even further than if Biden wins...
Cool, good to hear compassion for all those who will suffer in the 4 years until 2028
We should vote against our interest because if we don't, something worse will come along.
Have you thought about doing something else in your interest than just voting to legitimize your silly little empire?
I agree with you - it would be great if we could vote on policy and not individuals. (I say that, but I also acknowledge that in the past, majority rule at times had been detrimental to minority rights. But I digress.)
Since the reality is that we vote for representatives, and in the case of the presidential election, should we not vote for the candidate that is most closely aligned with our own interests? I think we also largely agree on that.
The critical point that we may disagree on is this. I posit that: If we ignore the reality of how our political system works, we ultimately end up losing our leverage to even make a point. You talk about making the Dems compromise, but if the Reps get into power, they sure aren't going to compromise, but rather, actively work against our interests.
I'm trying hard to find common ground here, but it seems like you haven't read my response at all.
Can you define the word anything? From my point of view, the Dems have compromised and shifted left on such things as legalization of same sex marriage, decriminalizing border crossings, higher taxes on the wealthy, access to cheaper/free higher education, reparations, trans rights, etc. Many of these were really not talked about in the 90s/00s or were actively disparaged back then.
In contrast, I've seen the overturn of RvW due directly from a Trump presidency, continual climate change denial, tax breaks for the wealthy, environmental protections abolished, etc. from the R side.
Therefore, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by making them work for the vote for once. Let's say we didn't vote D two decades ago, it would not have pushed into action many of the policies and rights that we enjoy right now. It seems more like, if we vote against the Dems, my interests will never come to fruition. Do you disagree? If so, why?
Okay, so maybe we're getting somewhere. I can see that you just described that the Dems can compromise (e.g. gay marriage), although you really want to frame it in the context of losing votes. Whatever, fine. I think we just agreed that Dems can compromise. That's big.
Second thing is that it sounds like you're a single issue voter. Or rather, this issue with Israel and Palestine, right now, is a roadblock.
Third thing is I want to set the stage and expectations first. You mentioned earlier about how Obama did not encode (I assume into law) RvW. Can we first agree that it's Congress, not the president that has that power? If so, let's move on.
Moving onto the Palestinian genocide, can we also agree that this is a complex foreign conflict? And that any actions, words, or even the wrong look our president gives will have serious, often unexpected consequences? If so, let's proceed.
There are 2 expectations you need to set for yourself: what would you be happy with and are those things realistic?
For the first: since this is another nation, would you be happy with him denouncing Israel's actions? How about invoking sanctions? Can you only be happy with things that he cannot directly control, for example, having Israel and Hamas agreeing to a ceasefire? Or Israel withdrawing?
The second part of this: if you want a specific outcome that is out of the president's direct control, we need to do a thought experiment. What, specifically, would you say would be the actions that Biden must take (BE SPECIFIC) and at what time and at what location and in what order to achieve your desired outcome?
I'll give you an example that you could mimic, if you want complete removal of Israeli troops from Gaza immediately, should Biden: 1) threaten Israel with reneging on military support, at 2) within 24 hours, and 3) at a press conference and live phone call? The consequences of this could be 1) Israel complies, 2) Israel is offended and ignores the demand, 3) Israel is offended and becomes an enemy. What are the chances that #1 is the outcome? And if it was, what are the global consequences of that? America just forced an ally under threat of not protecting them to do something it wasn't willing to do. This proposal is terrible, and I think my made up expectation of immediate removal of troops through threatening Israel is not a good expectation to have. Your turn.
I really want to see your proposal of what Biden should do, with specifics, that would satisfy your demands. Please don't cop out and just say "END GENOCIDE" without specifics. Global politics is hard.
Reagan picked up the phone and threatened Israel in 1984, and Israel immediately withdrew from their invasion of Lebanon.
HW Bush did a similar thing: call up Israel, threaten their military aid, and Israel immediately capitulated.
Why does Biden refuse to pick up the phone? Saying this solution is impractical is simply ignoring history.
If hes so afraid of the backlash, maybe he should also consider the backlash of being the only powerful nation to support this genocide. Loss of prestige and moral superiority on the world stage? Violent blowback against US troops in the region, or even worse, terrorist attacks on US civilians? And on the domestic stage, this is a huge gift to Trump.
Why is Bidem willing to sacrifice so much to continue this genocide?
Ok.. so when Trump wins Palestine will be in a great situation right? Better than now?