this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
584 points (99.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5055 readers
569 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The move to trains in Europe seems great! But still it costs me ~£300 short notice, ~£100 otherwise per person to get from London to Paris by train so for any trips it'll still need to be planes unfortunately. I dream of a day I can make an affordable night time trip to the Mediterranean on a train

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The UK has an atrocious train system in terms of cost.

Point fingers where they belong: your own government.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

amazing that building, maintaining, and fueling a fleet of airplanes is more cost effective than a few engines, coaches, and track.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's the innovation of privatization.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yea I got a fine because I took an Avanti North-west instead of an Avanti Wales train, on the same route -_- like wtf, if they are not the same company maybe they should not share the same name?

thanks a lot margaret

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Penalty fare. I wsn't in the right train even though they departed at the same time for the same destination.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What in the mother of fuck? Were they both totally full? Did you take a more expensive car than you'd paid for? That sounds nutter butters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Not even. It's just not the same company, not the same train so I had to pay for a new ticket with an on-board penalty fee. In Belgium, when I want to go somewhere, I go to the station, I buy a ticket from my origin to my destination and I hop into the next train. But according to liberals that goes against the will of the invisible hand or something

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

No taxes on fuel

Trains use infrastructures and not the air

it's just 2 examples. Complain at your government if you want things to change.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

You are correct but we should also point blame at the people who vote them into power!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The pricing and general operations on the Eurostar are pretty crap, which also annoys me to no end since I also use it semi frequently. Thankfully from what I've heard the high speed trains in Spain don't suffer from the same issues.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hopefully some competition will improve things. If this gets off the ground it can only be good for prices and service. https://www.euronews.com/travel/2023/10/12/evolyn-the-high-speed-rail-startup-with-mystery-investors-coming-for-eurostars-crown

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

"Competition will improve things" yeah sure.

Mass rail transportation as a public utility at an affordable price for everyone is never going to be a profitable operation. Competition in such a setting won't improve anything.
They'll just invest to run things at a loss while maintaining the same quality for a few years, get their share of the market and run the historical company in the ground, then increase prices and lower quality.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If the is one thing that the last couple of decades of privatised trains in the UK have shown, is that there is no possibility for real competition in trains, which should've been obvious from the start as you can't just have tons of companies lay train track at will to compete with uncompetitive established train operators.

The competition to trains are buses, cars and to a lesser extent planes, and some of those are only competitive against trains because their Negative Externalities (i.e. Polution) aren't reflected in the ticket price.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It works on high speed lines in Spain, where you’ve got Renfe, SNCF and Trenitalia all competing for business between Madrid and Barcelona. Also in Italy where Italo and Trenitalia compete head to head on a bunch of route. London/Paris isn’t that much different.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Three decades of having private operation in Britain for the whole train network only yielded higher prices and shittier service than the old public service.

Also every single one of the companies you listed there are public companies and that entire business model is only working because the State paid for the high speed infrastructure.

If you want to see what happens some years after the State stops pouring money into infrastructure, look at Britain again - the infrastructure is slowly decaying and trains are getting slower, with the exception of the whole Eurotunnel which is brand new, State paid, infrastructure.

Last and not least, 2 or 3 companies only caring about a handfull of high value routes is in no way form or shape sufficient competition to add up to a healthy competitive market (just look at how many airlines serve high value routes for reference of how real competition looks like and even there, there are barriers to entry - in the form of airport slots - that limit competition so it's far from perfect in terms of competition), not to mention tgat what you see in the main most profitable routes is most definitelly not something that you see in an entire network.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

It works on the few profitable liaison. Without the secondary network that is still publically operated, I suspect those route would not be profitable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

This would be great, but won't happen as quickly as they say, and even if a competitor does get going, the lack of capacity at St Pancras is a major blocker to reducing the ticket price.