this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
268 points (97.9% liked)

News

23014 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Chinese police are investigating an unauthorized and highly unusual online dump of documents from a private security contractor linked to the nation’s top policing agency and other parts of its government — a trove that catalogs apparent hacking activity and tools to spy on both Chinese and foreigners.

Among the apparent targets of tools provided by the impacted company, I-Soon: ethnicities and dissidents in parts of China that have seen significant anti-government protests, such as Hong Kong or the heavily Muslim region of Xinjiang in China’s far west.

The dump of scores of documents late last week and subsequent investigation were confirmed by two employees of I-Soon, known as Anxun in Mandarin, which has ties to the powerful Ministry of Public Security. The dump, which analysts consider highly significant even if it does not reveal any especially novel or potent tools, includes hundreds of pages of contracts, marketing presentations, product manuals, and client and employee lists.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those famous branches of a nation's government, Google and Meta.

The nation of Narnia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you are trying to imply that Google of all companies is NOT an arm of the US government, I’m sorry to say but you are so wrong.

Google was founded by CIA venture capital money. They’ve had massive contracts with the US government since they began.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry...

You think Larry Page, Scott Hassan and Sergey Brin worked for the CIA while also completing their degrees at Stanford and because of that they started one of multiple competing search engines with some diabolical plan to use internet voodoo to kill all the competition? If the CIA has those sort of magical powers, we're doomed.

Also, having massive government contracts doesn't mean you're an arm of the government.

Kraft has massive government contracts. You know, the cheese people?

Also- a big difference between Google and the Chinese Government? No one is forced to use Google and there are plenty of alternatives you can use without getting in any sort of legal jeopardy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I never said they worked for the CIA. But Larry Page and Sergey Brin do have lots of contacts inside of the government (and had them when they started Google out).

And this isn’t secret information at all… https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

And I love how you try to imply that having massive government defense and intelligence contracts means absolutely nothing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And I love how you try to imply that having massive government defense and intelligence contracts means absolutely nothing.

When did I imply any such thing? Do you think the only two options are 'exactly the same level of government surveillance as China' or 'absolutely nothing?'

Again- you do not have to use Google. Ever. No one is forcing you to use Google. It is not a requirement. The Chinese Government makes laws and has the power of life and death over its citizens.

Do you really not understand the difference?

As far as the article you provided, the author of it is a conspiracy-monger.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nafeez_Ahmed#Controversies

It makes absolutely no sense for the CIA to have made Google because when Google was created, it was assumed either Yahoo or Lycos would gain supremacy. So, again, unless they used some sort of internet voodoo to be able to see the future and know Google would win over those two, it's a nonsensical conspiracy theory.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah no, the spectrum of surveillance is “US private and government intelligence agencies <- the rest of the five eyes -> nothing”. It’s not a dichotomy, it’s a spectrum.

And that Wikipedia (🤮) article basically has way stronger arguments FOR Ahmed than against him lol not sure what you thought that did. Just because he has a “controversies” section? Did you even read it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah no, the spectrum of surveillance is “US private and government intelligence agencies <- the rest of the five eyes -> nothing”.

I'm sorry... are you now claiming that China has no government surveillance at all?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No I’d put them around the middle or a bit more towards the left. I don’t know where you got that I said that lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I got it from where you said:

the spectrum of surveillance is US private and government intelligence agencies <- the rest of the five eyes -> nothing

The five eyes are Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

In other words...

The spectrum of surveillance (according to you) is "US private and government intelligence agencies <- Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom -> nothing"

The only place I can see China fitting in to what you said is "nothing" since it isn't any of the five countries that you have counted.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I built the spectrum how I wanted to. I didn’t include China on the spectrum cause I feel that’s silly. The world is currently dominated by the US Empire. I don’t care about the anti-imperialist forces. I care about the Empire.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I didn’t include China on the spectrum cause I feel that’s silly.

This article is literally about China spying on its people. And on your spectrum, it is 'nothing' in terms of spying on its people.

And you still seem to be saying that China doesn't do that. And that would be what is silly.