this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
19 points (91.3% liked)

Linux

48001 readers
1025 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(sorry in advance for the long post)

What I'm looking for:

Basically, without a lot of work to setup and maintain a Domain/Kerberos server, what's the best way to provide consistent logins and remote folder/share (from a server) access across various Linux desktops


I've configured domain controllers using Samba. I've also configured Linux systems as domain-joined hosts. Between the two I tend to find that keeping talking - especially for systems that are only on infrequently - can be a bit troublesome. Updates sometimes break the Samba server, tokens expire, etc etc

I've also used NFS of various versions, but found v4 with the Kerberos implementation a bit finicky (for similar reasons to the SMB based implementation). NFSv3 of course is fairly fast and efficient, but lacks the user-level authentication and relies on IP's for access-control.


Now it's been awhile since I've given a shot at this except for some NFS shares between VMs and SSHFS for desktops, it would be nice to have a consistent but easily maintainable way to provided common shares for larger files (videos, albums, 3d models, and projects etc) without having to constantly troubleshoot. Maybe the domain/NFS route had gotten easier but it still seems to be fairly manual at times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Does this only need to work on LAN? I've not used Kerberos.

I've never had SMB break. It's definitely been my LAN network storage protocol of choice over the years, decent performance and perfect reliability so far.

And while I do have SSHFS set up, and use it sometimes, it's by far the slowest solution in my experience. I basically only use it to pull a file via phone if I need something off my desktop or home server that I didn't put in a location accessible via/synced to nextcloud, and I'm not at home to grab it via my desktop (which mounts my server's fulesystem via SMB).

Some time ago I finally set up off-site backup at my dad's, and while nextcloud has been my solution for convenient file storage, sharing and access from anywhere, it's extreme overkill for such a use-case.

It's better suited for syncing folders (using up space on both client and server), not mounting as a network storage location (though I think it can do that?)

What I ended up doing was setting up unencrypted FTP through the VPN that I use to access my home network. Server at dad's connects to it on startup, from there my server is able to see the off-site machine on my LAN and it can then dump backups into it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Nextcloud uses webDAV, so it definitely can be mounted as a network drive (this is how I primarily use it, and it works well).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I do actually have a NextCloud instance, which I primarily use for editing Documents (via Collabora) or syncing backups of folders like Pictures etc from the phone.

SMB/Samba by itself for just sharing folders I've had little issue with. Samba as a domain controller with domain-joined clients tied to domain logins is a more complicated beast and - in my experience -prone to breakage in my experience (expired tokens, certificate lifetimes, DNS integration, upgrade issues, etc) BUT it can provide a fairly complete package end-to-end when it works. I just feel that there should be a more Linux-centric/friendly and less bloaty solution that still others decent account-level security.

When you ask "only on LAN" the answer is yes with the caveat that I do also work through VPN, but that's often functionally the same thing save that the VPN login occurs after the user-login

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I don't think you can get more "linuxy" than samba. You can go down to something simpler, like FTP, or SHHFS which is basically also FTP, but there's no SMB equivalent that's "more linux".

It's all just different implementations of different protocols that exist, and SMB is used the most for a reason.