this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
262 points (93.4% liked)

News

23014 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Absolutely it's very frustrating watching them try to do so much only to have it curtailed by a Republican majority Congress.

People think the president can issue an executive order for anything they want. That being said I hope his cabinet does move on proposing this because it would be a huge win for pricing transparency.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Absolutely it’s very frustrating watching them try to do so much only to have it curtailed by a Republican majority Congress.

It was more frustrating two years ago when it was being curtailed by a Democratic majority congress.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah well Dems stopping tax cuts for the rich don't hurt us as much as Reps trying to shut down the government because we refuse tax cuts for the rich but by all means "both sides"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah well Dems stopping tax cuts for the rich don’t hurt us as much

Who said anything about them stopping tax cuts for the rich? I was talking about stuff Democrats did 2 years ago, like stopping the minimum wage increase and BBB. You know, their accomplishments.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

How in the world can you contribute that to the Dems when they were split and Republicans almost unanimously voted against it.

If you're issue is that they should have all voted to push it through then absolutely I wish they would too and you should vote in a way that reinforces what you'd like to see.

That being said of our two options Dems support it the most. If your argument is that we should have more options to vote for what we really want then we agree again, we need voter reform to make 3rd options viable via multi-choice voting

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How in the world can you contribute that to the Dems when they were split and Republicans almost unanimously voted against it.

BBB never made it to the floor, thanks to the only Democrat whose voice matters, Joe Manchin.

If you’re issue is that they should have all voted to push it through then absolutely I wish they would too

My issue is that the party is useless on purpose. Your issue is that I don't worship them for it.

I wish they would too and you should vote in a way that reinforces what you’d like to see.

There is no available way to vote that will ever reinforce what I'd like to see. Democrats oppose me less than Republicans do and that's the best they'll ever be willing to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Based insane take divorced from reality.

What in my reply made it seem like I worship them, they're the best we have and I long for better way but the only way we're going to get better is voteing reform on many levels.

Voting in fascists out of spite does no good.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the only people suggesting we should be voting in fascists are those who want trump or biden.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Equating those two absolutely smashes nuance. They aren't the same

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Nobody said they are the same, but that doesn't mean they aren't both facists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

if I said they were both old men or politicians or obscenely wealthy, would you think I'm saying they are the same?

they can share traits without being the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Some Democrats want to be the same across as many issues as possible without being called the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And predictable as the dawn, there it is.

The assumption that anger at Democrats' deliberate uselessness means advocacy for voting for Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

These people are just as blind as the fringe right conspiracist nutjobs. It's like they're arguing that McDonalds is better than Burger King because they only spit in your food 75% of the time rather than 95% of the time, while you're arguing that we shouldn't be eating at either of these restaurants to begin with. To top it all off they call you insane and a fascist for not agreeing with them.

This country is so fucked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Centrist Democrats can't imagine that people who don't want any spit at all in their burgers actually exist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it does, due to the unfortunate way our voting system is structured until massive voting reform voting for anyone accept the big two is literally voting for the other. It sucks but unless we change it we have to live with that

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What a convenient excuse to silence all criticism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nope, I'm very vocal about criticism and fixing it but the solution you suggest has already horribly backfired once but by all means shoot yourself in the foot again

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the solution you suggest

What solution did I suggest?

Oh right. You don't care. You don't want to listen, just lecture.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'll listen when you say something that isn't just deflection

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So what solution did I suggest?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Your responses were implicit that the only way to teach Democrats was to either vote Republican or third party.

Of course you did not come out and say this because you take a hard line stance on nothing instead, playing contrarian to everyone else.

Because as I've said before you only deflect you don't actually State what you believe. The entire time we've talked all you've done is call down existing institutions without offering up any actual solutions and anytime one is presented you deflect.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Your responses were implicit that the only way to teach Democrats was to either vote Republican or third party.

Hogwash. Democrats will never learn, and teaching them is a fool's errand. You seem to be operating under the misguided and all-too-common assumption that anyone who is critical of Democrats in the slightest is somehow in favor of Republicans or not voting.

Democrats are shit on purpose, and if that ever stops being true, I'll stop saying it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Nope never said anything of the sort and you're arguing in bad faith and criticize while proposing no solutions so at this juncture I would like to say agree to disagree and leave it at that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There never was a Democratic majority congress. West Virginia and Arizona both sent senators who had a D next to their name, but were really Rs.

Not only that, but you need a super majority in the senate to get anything real through, which means you need 60+ Democrats who ALL need to be on board, along with a majority of Democrats in the House, AND a Democrat president.

That hasn't happened since early Obama, and he squandered it by trying to pass bipartisan legislation with the Republicans, instead of just railroading the right things through.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

When was the last time Republicans held a majority like that and how is it that despite that majority, they still manage to pass all their vile legislation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

There never was a Democratic majority congress.

50 plus a tiebreaker is a majority. You lied.

West Virginia and Arizona both sent senators who had a D next to their name, but were really Rs.

West Virginia and Arizona sent senators who represent party leadership to absolute perfection. They define the party.

Not only that, but you need a super majority in the senate to get anything real through, which means you need 60+ Democrats who ALL need to be on board, along with a majority of Democrats in the House, AND a Democrat president.

The filibuster can be done away with forever with a simple majority. Manchin's party never will.

That hasn’t happened since early Obama, and he squandered it by trying to pass bipartisan legislation with the Republicans

He got the bailouts passed. Democrats could have destroyed the relic of Jim Crow that is the filibuster to pass the public option. But they didn't wanna.