this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
688 points (98.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54476 readers
366 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The reason that's never going to happen is because it would be the cause of massive profit losses for digital companies.

Capitalism makes the rules.

[–] SpeakinTelnet 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Another is because for a decentralized ownership service to hold any ground it must be either backed by a (centralized) court of law or hold the full service you're buying. Otherwise what's stopping a hosting platform to remove the service you bought with your nft from their platform?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Indeed. Needs to be run by an independent non-profit organisation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Not ONE government, but I'd accept something that lots of governments sign up to and share responsibility for. E.g. funding and making sure it is not giving any one country preferential treatment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why would there be massive losses licencing media properly?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
  1. A black market would arise. Finished with your show? Get your money back. NFTs aren't connected to identity like that.

  2. They could never pull a stunt like what they're doing now and make people rebuy things.

  3. Advertising opportunity would essentially fall to zero. Ever notice how ads play before and after streaming services nowadays?

  4. A subscription model wouldn't work under this system. Subscriptions pull in a higher net than single selling products.

The current system would be overturned in its entirety by something like this, and that's why the people making money and holding the rights aren't going to let it happen.