this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
41 points (87.3% liked)

Linux

48149 readers
921 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I opened firefox After about an hour of the system being in standby and in theSponsored Links row there were 2 new entries

http:/ /bom07s30-in-x03. 1e100. net/ (I dismantled the URLs to prevent accidental clicks)

pnbomb-ac-in-x0e.1e100

I right clicked and searched in Google and it showed up as this

pnbomb-ac-in-x0e.1e100 Sponsored it disappeared after a while, just to be sure I ran sudo lsof -i and noticed firefox was connected to this url

maa05s15-in-x03.1e100.net

I am not sure if am infected or this is just a glitch(I obviously didn't click on the links)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

From mozilla. I'm guessing that the links were hosted/owned/etc. by google. When your system resumed it only partially loaded the sponsored links and you were left with the text of the url.

Your system is fine security wise, but privacy wise pinging google servers everytime you open a new tab is not ideal. This type of stuff is why I use Librewolf. Of course it's up to you how much it bothers you. You can disable alot in vanilla firefox too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Librewolf Librewolf Librewolf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Thank you, but is there anyway I can check whether i am infected or not just for peace of mind?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

No. Peace of mind comes from trusting, not from knowing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Install clamav and run a scan. You will probably get false positives.

For instance the gnome polkit agent has a "malicious" image that it tries to load at start and if it succeeds it kills the program before it can run. This is to keep an actually malicious icon from being used. I spent days on that one lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But isnt clam AV only for detecting Windows viruses?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Depends on the malware database you use, but out of the box it'll catch wide range of stuff, even linux malwares (which is rare but exists and mostly infect vulnerable web servers).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Not with 100% certainty outside of nuking your system. You’re probably fine.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Antivirus programs are generally the go-to method...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Note that anti-virus can only assert that you are infected, not the opposite.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're saying even if you're not confirmed as infected, you're not necessarily confirmed as not being infected. In other words, you're talking about false positives.

Am I understanding you correctly?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The opposite. Not found negatives. Anti-virus software can only tell you that it didn't find a virus, not that there aren't any.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, what you just said is what I said I thought you said. (@_@)

We're on the same page; it's just that wording is hard.

Also, you all were right; I was wrong. Admission given. 👍

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you're on the same page, but mean false negatives not false positive.
False negatives being the potential that you have the virus, but the scanner wasn't able to identify it so returned a "you're all clean" when in fact, you've got a dirty virus and should have listened in health class.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah.

Like I said, words are hard. Lol.