Selfhosted

39435 readers

3 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Setting Up a Secure Tunnel Between Two Machines (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have two machines running docker. A (powerful) and B (tiny vps).

All my services are hosted at home on machine A. All dns records point to A. I want to point them to B and implement split horizon dns in my local network to still directly access A. Ideally A is no longer reachable from outside without going over B.

How can I forward requests on machine B to A over a tunnel like wireguard without loosing the source ip addresses?

I tried to get this working by creating two wireguard containers. I think I only need iptable rules on the WG container A but I am not sure. I am a bit confused about the iptable rules needed to get wireguard to properly forward the request through the tunnel.

What are your solutions for such a setup? Is there a better way to do this? I would also be glad for some keywords/existing solutions.

Additional info:

Ideally I would like to not leave docker.
Split horizon dns is no problem.
I have a static ipv6 and ipv4 on both machines.
I also have spare ipv6 subnets that I can use for intermediate routing.
I would like to avoid cloudflare.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I have heard of it seems like a good option. If you use it please tell me if it can fullfil my requirements.

Mhh I didn't know headscale exists. Tailscale being proprietary was the main thing keeping me from using it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I haven't used Tailscale myself, but it seems like it's basically just a Wireguard frontend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Although correct, there feature set is amazing and expanding. Tailscale is my number one tool of choice, these days, it's so simple and so handy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

"Technically correct" is the best form of correct. Though having tried setting up Wireguard in the past, having a dead-simple solution like Tailscale might be worth trying it out, especially with the 100 device free tier