this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
1928 points (98.2% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
6 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1928
Never again (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
215 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Imagine "stealing" a project just because you can write sensible documentation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Another way to think about this is that those projects that have a more structured approach to documentation have a better chance at lasting longer, attracting more contributors, and making more lasting impacts

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

If it's open source and the license allows it, I wouldn't consider that stealing. If a fork gets more popular than the original, then it either addresses a major missing feature of the original or is simply more active. If this displeases the original dev, they can hopefully work it out with the maintainers of the fork. This is a feature of FOSS, not a bug.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is it stealing if it's been dead for 30 years? Or is it modernizing it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

What? We are talking about discord documented software.