Games

16742 readers

141 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

136

Xbox Is Not Your Friend (www.kotaku.com.au)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

After laying off almost 2,000 people, Xbox finds itself in a position at odds with the community-first image it has cultivated for itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

yeah I see your point but at that point it's not hostile since I'm pretty sure that Valve has 51% between board members based on their culture and hierarchy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

The definition of "hostile takeover" is getting 51% w/o a formal agreement. So if MS approached everyone independently and got 51%, it's a hostile takeover. And they don't need 51% control through their own entity, they can pay independent people to do so.

I think that's unlikely to happen, but it's possible.