this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
177 points (98.4% liked)
Science
13200 readers
7 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well shit... my area looks bad. The article does say:
But considering the rest of the article, that's not very reassuring
So chemicals that are dangerous to human health were found in 45% of water but we shouldn't worry? Nah bro I'm putting reverse osmosis filters and boiling it.
RO water is seen as unsuitable for consumption due to lack of important minerals. Activated carbon filters should help with reducing PFAS
i've heard that's a myth, but just in case you can add a re-mineralizer module to most RO systems as a last stage.
Edit: so it's not a myth but needs context
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241593989
Here is a relatively old WHO report, page 88 basically says if you're getting enough nutrients from food then the impacts of reduced minerals in water aren't significant. Conversely on page 158 they show increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death in animals from demineralized water, however, they do concede that those were external studies, the methods may not meet modern scrutiny but should not be outright dismissed. In other words more information is needed.
The pdf is from 2005 so there's probably newer studies out there. In any case adding an alkaline filter makes RO water taste better and it's cheap enough to not have to worry about it.
That's interesting, thank for you adding more information.