this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)
urbanism
22307 readers
1 users here now
This was supposed to be c/traingang, so post as many train pictures as possible.
All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.
Home of train gang
:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:
Trainposts highly encouraged
Talk about supply chain issues here!
List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things
Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.
Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.
LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN
"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The power available from a hydropower dam is P = 9.81๐โ๐ where P is the power in kilowatts, q is the flow rate in cubic meters per second, h is the head height in meters, and ฮท is the efficiency factor. This paper claims that beaver dams have a head height from 0.3m-5m with most below 1.5m and a width up to 46m but usually 10m or less and mentions that beaver dams can withstand a flow rate of 1.34m^3/s per meter width for a dam with a height of 1.4m. So if we estimate a 75% efficiency and go with 1.34m^3/s per meter width, 10m width and 1.4m head that gives us:
P = 9.81 * 13.4 m^3/s * 1.4m * 0.75
for a power of 138kW.
that's a lot less power i'm assuming?
Less than what? For comparison, the average Amerikkkan home uses about 1.2kW.
I did not fully absorb your comment but I reread it and understand it now