this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
488 points (94.5% liked)

Bicycles

3108 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to [email protected]

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Globally, only one in 50 new cars were fully electric in 2020, and one in 14 in the UK. Sounds impressive, but even if all new cars were electric now, it would still take 15-20 years to replace the world’s fossil fuel car fleet.

The emission savings from replacing all those internal combustion engines with zero-carbon alternatives will not feed in fast enough to make the necessary difference in the time we can spare: the next five years. Tackling the climate and air pollution crises requires curbing all motorised transport, particularly private cars, as quickly as possible. Focusing solely on electric vehicles is slowing down the race to zero emissions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Cycling is not the solution. It's infrastructure.

I would love a walkable city. But I can't afford housing close to the city. The bus or train system isn't strong enough or convenient enough. Our country are set up for cars. Housing prices are set up for people to drive further to live.

Have affordable housing near the places I work and I won't need to drive. Stop blaming people for living their lives around a broken infrastructure. Stop cramming bicycles down our throats. We are not the problem.

[–] Isoprenoid 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We are not the problem.

Then what is the problem?

The infrastructure

And who built the infrastructure?

We did.

👉

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"we" is used very liberally here. I had no say in the planning, implementation, or even the allocation of funds for the current infrastructure. In fact, most of it has existed since before I was born.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You’ve also been able to vote in a few local elections along the way, yeah? Where I’m at there are often candidates who champion bicycle infrastructure, and it’s not a new phenomenon. More often than not they’re mocked and not elected. I imagine my city isn’t unique in that.

So yea, WE are to blame.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, I'm to blame for being outvoted. Thanks. Fuck you too.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago

It’s not a personal attack on your character. It’s fact. Grow the fuck up.

[–] Isoprenoid 3 points 10 months ago

most of it has existed since before I was born.

I'm sure a lot of things existed before you were born.

There were also a lot of things that didn't exist before you were born.

Change da world, my final message. Good bye.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I'm sick of people blaming the people. I'm sick of people trying to shove bicycles down our throats like THAT will fix the issue.

My comment was in response to the blaming of the people and pushing cycling as the solution. This article should be, how do we influence better zoming laws. How we do improve the city infrastructure.

We do vote. Every election cycle. We do what we can with our few voices.

The sooner we stop upvoting these shit articles the sooner we can fix the actual issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah cars aren’t part of the solution at all

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cars are just the "effect" of the "cause". Vote in your local elections for better zoning laws and stop upvoting these shit articles that blame the people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We won’t fix the problem until they are gone

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, with that logic, if 1/2 of the world population didn't eat and just died, that would also fix the problem too. But that isn't going to happen so your statement is as dumb as mine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Put a ban in place for 2030 or 2035 and it will be fixed

If you don’t do that then everything will be designed with the existence of cars in mind

Even today they are building new roads, you go to a sub division and there are roads in front of every house

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So people like me who can't afford a job near my work have to ride a bicycle for 40 miles one-way for my work because someone in the past made home zoning impossible to scale the population growth.

Please tell me why I have to suffer and those fuckers who is camping in those expensive unattainable homes get to enjoy their home values?

Why do you want people like me to suffer more than I already do by having to drive 80 miles a day?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The point is you won’t fix that if there are cars

Why would you suffer from an issue that only exists because of cars if there weren’t cars?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. Plenty of countries have converted highways to bike lanes successfully and continued using their cars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

As his concern points out why that won’t work

How many of those countries are as wide as us

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

They certainly are, they just need to go around city centers instead of through. Cars make a ton of sense for longer trips (way better than an empty bus), they don't make sense downtown.