this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
1055 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12743 readers
2661 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Ctrl-alt-del is meant to be a hard interrupt to the system.

Ctrl-shift-esc treats it like another task.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

Interesting so that's why system performance gets wonky when task Manager is opened with CTRL+alt+Del

I'll keep that in mind when I wanna kill tasks but not disrupt performance

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I assume this terminology originally referred to an actual interrupt handled by a kernel interrupt handler, and half of the people in this thread have no idea what that means.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's so dumb, but okay.

Edit: dumb that using the shortcut to open the task manager doesn't interrupt the system. That's what ctrl-alt-del did before windows 8 or whenever, open the task manager regardless of what was happening. Now I have to use that annoying lock-screen menu to open the task manager to kill processes if things are locked up. Didn't know that, horribly unintuitive

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

how is it dumb? literally just press ctrl shift esc

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

If your computer is locked up, you have to use ctrl-alt-del, with its menu of options including the task manager, in order to interrupt the current processes locking up the system.

Using ctrl-shift-esc launches the task manager program without a system interrupt, meaning it won't unlock the computer. Which is dumb, because why else would I be opening the task manager other than to interrupt some out-of-control process? I guess you could be using it to monitor or something else, but that's what I'm used to opening the task manager to be doing. I didn't even realize this until this comment.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I use task manager way more often for monitoring than I use it for stopping processes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

When i was using windows i killed programs quite regularly with ctrl shift esc. I didn't need a full system interrupt but the programs weren't completely out if control.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I check ram and cpu usage and change startup apps or task priority just as much as I need to force quit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

then just press ctrl alt del if you want a system interrupt??? there's a reason they have bindings for both. it's not much harder, the task manager doesn't exist solely for killing some program that won't respond.