this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
66 points (100.0% liked)

todayilearned

869 readers
1 users here now

todayilearned

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
66
Ballistics evidence not reliable nor based on science, Maryland Supreme Court says (www.wusa9.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

"There was a study called Ames 2, and what that study found that when they tried to reproduce the opinions of one examiner versus another examiner, they found that over 50% of the time, the second examiner came to a different conclusion on the same evidence than the first examiner," Gilleran explained.

Yeah, that's pretty damning.