this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
213 points (93.1% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
347 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The largest Canadian newspapers have given disproportionate attention to the deaths of Israelis, portrayed Israelis in more humanized ways, characterized their deaths as more worthy of indignation, and more often identified who was responsible for killing them, a comprehensive comparison of reporting on the deaths of Israelis and Palestinians reveals.

The Breach analyzed thousands of sentences in coverage in The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, and National Post from Oct. 7 to Nov. 24. The study found that dozens of Palestinian deaths were required to merit just one mention in the newspapers, while there was one mention of Israeli deaths for every two Israelis who died.

The study shows a pattern of anti-Palestinian bias in Canada’s establishment media, sanitizing political violence against Palestinians and unequally stirring emotions about Israeli deaths.

Despite the unprecedented scale of Israeli bombing that has killed 20,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, the newspapers have never used emotionally evocative terms like “massacre” or “slaughter” to describe their deaths. Meanwhile, they regularly used those terms to describe the Hamas attack on Israelis on Oct. 7, when militants killed 1,139 people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

My issue is the notion of Palestinians making other not Palestine land their new homeland, which is emphatically never gonna happen and needs to be shut down however forcefully it requires. Nobody wants to live like that, so I'm unsympathetic to their obession with enforcing Islam through the nexus of a theocratic, oppressive state. Its interesting that for all the talk of oppression they literally want to run an oppressive theocratic state, its like a snake complaining it can't bite because its in an aquarium or its had its dangerous teeth removed

Edit: for all the talk against Israel, I would much rather live their than some of the crappy places theocrats inevitably turn the place into the moment they have have hegemonic and millitary dominance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

My issue is the notion of Palestinians making other not Palestine land their new homeland, which is emphatically not happening.

Do you have a link for this info 'cause I haven't seen anything about it.

Nobody wants to live like that, so I'm unsympathetic to their obession with enforcing Islam through the nexus of a theocratic, oppressive state.

I believe you're mixing up Palestinians and Hamas. The two are not necessarily the same.