this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2021
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

34891 readers
767 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

The new app bundles format is a worrying trend! If it's truly exclusive to the Play Store and can't be brought to Aurora Store or the Android package installer somehow and APKs start to fizzle out, users of degoogled Android ROMs are going to suffer. If some big name apps are only available as AABs then tough luck.

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 3 years ago

I doubt, AABs are only proposed as an incremental update option rather than a replacement of APK model. APKs can and are built, considering most companies want their apps to be usable inside of Google banned countries, and for small devs the AAB option is harmful for distribution. I also read that AABs can also be used to disperse installations across various architecture platforms and DPI screens as well, so this point could be somewhat concerning, still not as much. Correct me if I am wrong.