In a singles match, if wrestler A gets disqualified, then wrestler B has no one to wrestle, so the match is over and they win.
But with 3 (or more) wrestlers, wrestler B would still have wrestler C, etc, so the match could continue without wrestler A.
So why doesn't it?
I've never understood this, and would appreciate people's thoughts.
(Pic barely related)
@GeekFTW @hellothere I've always preffered the three-way-dance to the triple threat, and not only for this reason but its one of them.