this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
174 points (90.7% liked)

Open Source

31394 readers
191 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR: Companies should be required to pay developers for any open source software they use.

He imagines a simple yearly compliance process that gets companies all the rights they need to use Post-Open software. And they'd fund developers who would be encouraged to write software that's usable by the common person, as opposed to technical experts.

It's an interesting concept, but I don't really see any feasible means to get this to kick off.

What are your thoughts on it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What loophole? I think they're just blatantly violating it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They're still providing the code for people who buy the compiled software. And they are not restricting their ability to redistribute that code. So it's still compliant with the GPL in the letter. However, if you redistribute it, they'll refuse to service you further versions of the software.

It's clearly a loophole because they can argue "ackshyually, we didn't restrict you, we just don't want further businesses with you, see ya sucker".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Enshittification continues

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is there a court case about this already? Because that's clearly not the intention of the GPL.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think that there is one yet, otherwise it would get famous. Not sure though.