this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
750 points (97.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5833 readers
30 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ah yes, the Panasonic Discman, the prime successor to the Phillips Walkman.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Glad I'm not the only one who got a twitchy eye reading that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I thought to myself for the briefest of moments: Am I being Mandela Effect’d?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I am really confused now. I know Discman is Sony's name, but generally people refer to any such portable CD player as "discman". At least where I live.
And it's not just regular people, even shops refer to them as dicmans.
Here are some examples to back my claims:

exampleshttps://www.alza.sk/discmany/18886534.htm
https://aukro.sk/discmany
https://www.mall.sk/discmany
https://discmany.heureka.sk/
https://www.okay.sk/collections/discmany

The only exception seems to be Nay, referring to this category as "Portable CD players".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

That’s very interesting! Around me, we called them CD Players, it must be a regional thing. Many people called the portable cassette player a Walkman, even though that was a lineup of products from Sony.

Looking on US Amazon, there are several players that have Discman, Walkman, or both in the titles. Sony must not be enforcing their trademarks (wrong term?) for the first non-sponsored listing being called:

2000mAh Rechargeable Discman CD Player:Walkman CD Player…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yepp, we all called them Discman back in the day regardless of the brand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah we called them all discman too. A Kleenex/tissue situation imo.

Edit: though I do concede an official label in some sort of display probably should use the generic form “portable CD player” or something similar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I believe other brands have the same problem.

Velcro is a good example.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

generally people refer to any such portable CD player as "discman". At least where I live.

Yeah, and there's people that call them Kleenex, Velcro, and iPads. That doesn't make them right.

There's no confusion - Discman is the model of Sony's portable CD players. People using the term incorrectly is simply that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

At least it's not a sony ipod