this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
387 points (97.1% liked)

News

23014 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was not immediately clear why the sedan smashed into an SUV that was part of the motorcade. The driver was surrounded by agents who had their guns drawn.

A sedan smacked into a Secret Service vehicle that was part of President Joe Biden's motorcade in Delaware on Sunday night.

Following the crash, U.S. Secret Service agents whisked Biden into a vehicle.

Agents quickly surrounded the sedan with guns drawn and aimed at its driver, who had his hands up. The cause of the crash was not immediately clear.

Special Agent Steve Kopek, a Secret Service spokesperson, said the vehicle that struck was securing Biden's motorcade route.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 132 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If this was just a DUI or something, the driver is going to have a very very bad time.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A car accident is horrifying enough. Can you imagine realizing you just hit the presidential motorcade? In Delaware?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is Delaware worse for some reason?

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Just the realization that you're in Delaware is enough.

Like, who even lives in Delaware?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

So...lottsa people /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember the first time I met a person from Delaware. I was shocked. I think I said to them, "I didn't know anyone actually lived there."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe we just don't know what they do about Delaware and that's why they never leave. It's a paradise beyond paradises.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I'll have to know, there are dozens of us

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Can you even call that living?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

All the corporations ever. Wonder if they count for the population since they became people.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Delamain. Wake up, Samurai

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I believe it’s Biden’s home state, so people around there probably love him. Can’t imagine being very popular with your neighbors once news gets out.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

On the other hand, the driver probably has a uniquely high chance of a presidential pardon. Seeing how the president is already aware of his case.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The president could only ask the delaware governor to grant one.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good eye skimmed over the Delaware part. Assuming it was a DUI (and not an intentional attack) it'd be state jurisdiction.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, he might catch some federal flack, but it seems most of his issues will be state affairs unless this wasn't just hitting the worst possible car.

Even if he were a drunk terrorist, the feds would handle the attack, and as long he isn't charged federally (if one even could be), the state can still slap an everyday DUI there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If he gets pardoned and it happens again can he use the same pardon twice?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Non-joke answer: Pardons are for a person's actions not the person in general. He would need a second pardon.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats an interesting distinction :) Can you talk more about that?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure what exactly you want me to touch on. But pardons can't be for future actions.

Let's say you rob a bank and get pardoned. Having received that pardon doesn't mean you can go rob that bank again free of charge.

If you had robbed that bank again after getting pardoned you'd face prison time. But if the president happens to believe in ~~second~~ third chances and grants you a second pardon for the second robbery you could walk free.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gotcha, ya I didn't think it was like omnibus/universal immunity for future offences aha. That would be like...presidential immunity and even that's not supposed to be a forever thing, shouldn'teven be allowed during or should be heavily qualified

Edit: found it interesting that pardons can actually halt the prosecutorial effort altogether, like prior to a verdict. Maybe there should be a cooling off period like requiring all oending litigation to play out and then by then see where everybody's at.

Justice delayed/disrupted ⚖️ right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah the idea behind a pardon is that the head executive is basically saying that you’ve been punished enough and that no further prosecution will occur. It’s similar to how they can stay a death penalty. But the big downside is that accepting a pardon means accepting legal guilt. You can’t keep fighting a case saying you weren’t ever guilty.

For an example of how far pardons go look at Nixon. The case was still being built, and Ford (idiotically) deemed that proceeding with a trial of a former president over election misdeeds would do too much damage to the nation’s trust in its political system. Nixon didn’t stand trial. Nixon only pled guilty by acceptance of the pardon. But because of that, had he been able to run again (he’d hit his term limit) and tried, he would’ve had a court case over if his crimes prohibited him from running again, same as if he’d gone to prison for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If it doesn't work for farts, probably not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would this be considered a federal offense? Seems like a local thing. The president can only pardon federal crimes.

[–] First 3 points 1 year ago

That's not true, he can also pardon his French.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There's a couple ways they could make this a federal offence depending on the circumstances, ranging from destruction of federal property (assuming Biden was in a gov car) to attempted assassination of the active US president. Again depending on the circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Immediately disappeared to a black site.

[–] MagicShel 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah I was hoping for an update, but I just realized the Secret Service is going to be up this guy's ass like a colonoscopy for a long time before we hear anything.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Decidedly one of the worst hangovers anyone's ever had. "What happened last ni-oh my God"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

To be fair, he shouldn't suffer any greater punishment than if he had hit into anyone else.