UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1207 readers

4 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

[email protected]

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Reluctant Congressmen Given Opportunity to Change their Opposition to Schumer Amendment. (www.youtube.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Of note in this report is the suggestion that someone has spoken with the two Republicans opposing disclosure. And it’s hinted that they were warned that failure to support controlled disclosure would result in ‘catastrophic’ disclosure…which I take to mean, runaway disclosure.

My mind turns to something mentioned here a few months ago from Ross Coulthart: that a certain too-large-to-move crashed object, residing in a place outside US control might get revealed if progress is not made.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They’re creating a Streisand effect by fighting this amendment. It does seem that the amendment was created knowing that the march to disclosure has already started and is meant to ensure it’s done smoothly. It could be as simple as knowing that too many whistleblowers have come forward and the government can’t prevent details of these programs from coming to light. In any case, the ball started rolling a while back and they seem to think there’s no stopping it.